Everything2
Near Matches
Ignore Exact
Full Text
Everything2

Baker v. Carr

created by Myconid

(idea) by Myconid (4.5 y) (print)   ?   I like it! Sun May 07 2000 at 4:22:04

Baker v. Carr (1962)

A landmark Supreme Court case in which the principle of "one person, one vote" was established. The decision required the reapportionment of state legislatures so that each representative would serve the same number of constituents. Previously, some legislatures from sparsely settled rural areas represented only half as many people as their counterparts from populous urban areas.

See also: Civil Rights Rulings (Circa 1960's)

(idea) by rfc1394 (4.3 y) (print)   ?   I like it! Sun Apr 15 2001 at 5:36:07

U.S. Supreme Court

BAKER v. CARR, 369 U.S. 186 (1962)*

BAKER ET AL. v. CARR ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE
No. 6.
Argued April 19-20, 1961. Set for reargument May 1, 1961. Reargued October 9, 1961.
Decided March 26, 1962.

Appellants are persons allegedly qualified to vote for members of the General Assembly of Tennessee representing the counties in which they reside. They brought suit in a Federal District Court in Tennessee under 42 U.S.C. 1983, on behalf of themselves and others similarly situated, to redress the alleged deprivation of their federal constitutional rights by legislation classifying voters with respect to representation in the General Assembly. They alleged that, by means of a 1901 statute of Tennessee arbitrarily and capriciously apportioning the seats in the General Assembly among the State's 95 counties, and a failure to reapportion them subsequently notwithstanding substantial growth and redistribution of the State's population, they suffer a "debasement of their votes" and were thereby denied the equal protection of the laws guaranteed them by the Fourteenth Amendment. They sought, inter alia, a declaratory judgment that the 1901 statute is unconstitutional and an injunction restraining certain state officers from conducting any further elections under it. The District Court dismissed the complaint on the grounds that it lacked jurisdiction of the subject matter and that no claim was stated upon which relief could be granted.

Held:

1. The District Court had jurisdiction of the subject matter of the federal constitutional claim asserted in the complaint. Pp. 198-204.

2. Appellants had standing to maintain this suit. Pp. 204-208.

3. The complaint's allegations of a denial of equal protection presented a justiciable constitutional cause of action upon which appellants are entitled to a trial and a decision. Pp. 208-237.

179 F. Supp. 824, reversed and cause remanded.
See Also: Landmark Case, Civil Rights Rulings (Circa 1960's)
* Click here to understand what those numbers mean

printable version
chaos

Civil Rights Rulings (Circa 1960's) landmark case Court Citation Archibald Cox
Mapp v. Ohio Roe v. Wade Civil Rights Act of 1964 Buckley v. Valeo
Stockwell Day
Y'know, if you log in, you can write something here, or contact authors directly on the site. Create a New User if you don't already have an account.
  Epicenter
Login
Password

password reminder
register

Everything2 Help

Cool Staff Picks
Nodes to live by:
Cold cereal
The mama and the dancing girl, unfurling
sexist
Hawthorn
Spam
Tap
Perl
Super Candles
Katrina shelter
Metal Machine Music
Europe and the Other
Things you should never do with chopsticks
The Quiet American
New Writeups
everyday j.Lo
pray do not molest them(thing)
ammie
Bands Who Take Their Names from Eighteenth-century English Poetry and Prose(idea)
shaogo
Under My Thumb(review)
ammie
Rock On(person)
The Custodian
The Dresden Files(thing)
Ouzo
PETA becomes you, a proposed future(fiction)
Ereneta
Stone Soup, Part Two(fiction)
jjen
Sorrier than I ever thought I would be(personal)
locke baron
Moskva class antisubmarine cruiser(thing)
Wuukiee
May 15, 2008(idea)
locke baron
Kuznetsov class aircraft carrier(thing)
Adaptive Child
Annie's garden salsa(recipe)
Simulacron3
Zig-Zag(thing)
Noung
Tiananmen Square Massacre(idea)
aneurin
Lord St Clair(person)
E2 is a by-product of the existence of The Everything Development Company