Brave New World

(thing) by anomie Sat May 06 2000 at 5:49:58
A novel painting a dark picture of the future, in which all people are grown in jars, manipulated physically and chemically in vitrio (i can't exactly say "in vivo" here) to adjust intelligence and tolerance to extreme environments, and through classical conditioning and hypnopaedia after decantation to implant the government-designed morality. Everyone is made to be happy with their lot in life and consumer culture, and all are given the drug soma to be self-administered whenever unpleasant reality intrudes. But without the freedom to be unhappy or have any choice in life, do they really live?

The protagonists attempt to challenge this order, which brings out the whole point of the book. Read it, it's good

Although 1984 is more popular, Brave New World seems to be closer to our actual future...

(thing) by Triune Wed May 30 2001 at 20:48:15
Created by Alderac Entertainment, Brave New World is a superhero game set in an alternative Earth, one in which superheroic ("delta") powers appeared during World War I, exhibited by Peter Payne, an African-American soldier soon to become the Silver Ghost. Deltas began to appear throughout the rest of the world, too, affecting politics and history. During World War II, a delta named Sparky was killed in a Nazi concentration camp uprising. The soldiers threw his body into the fire, but Sparky was transformed-he turned into an even more powerful being who quickly and single-handedly put an end to World War II by tearing apart the concentration camp, the Nazi's most powerful delta, and Hitler himself. This new delta became known as Superior, and his "type" as an "alpha."

Superior dominated the world scene, even though other, less-powerful alphas began to arise. He kept America in power through the Cold War. Then, on November 22, 1963, a group of deltas-Devastator's Dreadnauts-attacked President Kennedy, the First Lady, and the governor of Texas in a motorcade. Superior flew to their rescue, arriving in time to save President Kennedy, but not in time to save the First Lady and the governor of Texas. He flew Kennedy to a hospital, where the president was in a coma for three days before awakening. When Kennedy awoke, he pushed the Delta Registration Act through Congress, requiring all deltas to register with the government or be imprisoned. Kennedy also established a new police force, Delta Prime, made of patriotic deltas who would enforce the DRA.

Now, at the end of the century, Kennedy is still in office, president for life. The Declaration of Independence, the Constitution of the United States and the Bill of Rights have been trampled into the ground by the oppressive legislation of deltas. The devastation caused by deltas-the loss of Chicago, the strange disappearance of all alphas, the torn girders and broken sidewalks that mark cities where deltas have fought-has led most of the U.S. population to support the Delta Registration Act. But your character isn't registered. Your character is on the run. If you're lucky, you might join up with the Defiance, a loose-knit group of renegade deltas that hope to return freedom to America. If you're unlucky, Delta Prime will hunt you down and either kill or imprison you.

Background provided by Dru Pagliassott and Johnn Four
(thing) by rpl Fri Jun 15 2001 at 2:02:35
One reason that nobody has yet mentioned why Aldous Huxley's Brave New World is so much more insightful than Orwell's 1984 is that Huxley gives his totalitarian regime a voice, in the person of World Controller Mustapha Mond.

Towards the end of the story, after the incident at the death clinic, Mustapha Mond sits our heroes down (along with us, the readers) and explains, patiently, why the regime is the way it is. He freely acknowledges the casualties (art, science, religion) of the new order, but he asserts that the gains outweigh the losses. To me, Mustapha Mond is far more terrifying than Big Brother ever was because Mustapha Mond is a reasonable man who created his dystopian nightmare with the best motives and intentions; whereas, Big Brother apparently oppresses people just out of sheer cussedness. Big Brother is a caricature; Mustapha Mond is a portrait.

There is a powerful lesson here. The slide into dystopia will not be precipitated by some cackling, moustache-twirling villain. It will be precipitated by the do-gooders of the world who will systematically extirpate all that is noble about civilization, all the while thinking they are doing us a favor by doing so.

Some other random Brave New World tidbits:

  • The similarity between the title and Miranda's quote from The Tempest is, of course, no accident. John Savage quotes this line ironically when he sees the modern civilization for what it really is.
  • The drug soma comes from Thomas Moore's Utopia
  • There's a coffeehouse in Bloomington, Indiana called Soma, which used to carry t-shirts with bearing a quotation of the passage in which Huxley first describes the drug Soma. When I was living in Bloomington, it was my favorite place to go for a ``half-holiday''.
  • Brave New World was published in 1932; in 1958 Huxley published Brave New World Revisited, a collection of essays (or one long essay broken into chapters, if you prefer) in which he examines the extent to which his predictions in BNW have come true in the real world and their prospects for coming about in the future.
(thing) by alex Fri Jan 04 2002 at 14:39:16

Iron Maiden (Columbia Records, 2000-05-30

Steve Harris (bass, keyboards)
Dave Murray (guitars)
Adrian Smith (guitars)
Bruce Dickinson (vocals)
Nicko McBrain (drums)
Janick Gers (guitars)

  1. The Wicker Man (Smith/Harris/Dickinson)
  2. Ghost Of The Navigator (Gers/Dickinson/Harris)
  3. Brave New World (Murray/Harris/Dickinson)
  4. Blood Brothers (Harris)
  5. The Mercenary (Gers/Harris)
  6. Dream Of Mirrors (Gers/Harris)
  7. The Fallen Angel (Smith/Harris)
  8. The Nomad (Murray/Harris)
  9. Out Of The Silent Planet (Gers/Dickinson/Harris)
  10. The Thin Line Between Love And Hate (Murray/Harris)

"My name is alex and I'm an old-school headbanger. I'm so ancient I remember Savatage and life before Sepultura. Shit, I remember when people slow danced to Scorpions music. Help me!"

The critique

The year was 1991. After the success of Seventh Son and the departure of Adrian Smith, Iron Maiden released Fear of the Dark. It was the dregs. In fact, it sucked so badly that I and many others wrote the band off and they did little to prove me wrong in the next couple of albums. And then, nine years later, they returned with their twelfth studio album, Brave New World. And, while musically there's little truly new about it, it was a shocking revelation.

Frankly, I didn't even listen to it until over a year after its release. As Dickinson put it, "sad, old fuckers getting back together to go and make a few bucks" was what I thought. Then It fell into my hands and lo and behold! Twelve years after their last masterpiece, Maiden were at it again. The "classic" line-up of their glory days plus Janick Gers present what may well be the swan song of the New Wave of British Heavy Metal (honestly, I'll be amazed if they can repeat it). I don't think there's been such a musical comeback since Deep Purple's Perfect Strangers in 1984, another album that closed an era the same band had opened.

Am I raving? Mm, I think I am. Let's disregard the accusations of rehashing their heyday's best work. If this is what recycled riffs can do, I say bring 'em on. This is what the public wanted, this is what the band gave them. This is vintage Maiden and those who spent a dozen years listening to their old stuff can rejoice. Sound-wise and in terms of compositions I'd place it closest to Somewhere In Time which I didn't really like but this one has much more history to fall back on.

On a musical level the shadows of the past are deep and the band combine elements from all their previous albums, not only the classics. It's as though they had to do it to prove again that they can stand among the very few great bands that made up a brilliant whole out of units quite remarkable in their own right. It's not totally lacking in originality. They explore and make the best of the rich potential of three first-class guitars in the line-up and neither Dickinson nor Harris are afraid of innovation. The reappearance of Smith and Dickinson as songwriters definitely boosts the album's quality too.

Eddie Lives! (and of course Derek Riggs is there to make sure he does)

The band

Bruce Dickinson makes a surprising comeback from written-off rocker hell. His vocals don't dominate like they used to but are still powerful, moreso than in his solo work, and blend in with the music better than they used to. His technique has improved noticably.

Steve Harris is God. End of story. He led this band from dank little clubs in England to stadia all over the world, filled them and followed them into decline, only to lead them back in style. His compositions are richer and more classical, he has reached maturity as a lyricist and his playing is, needless to say, the performance of a virtuoso of the rarest kind.

Gers, Smith and Murray are a guitar trio to be feared. It's been over ten years since the world last saw such a guitar... umm, onslaught, as we'd put it "back when." Those three have brought old school guitar metal back from the grave and made it look larger than life. They shine together and individually as befits masters of their chosen art. The guitar tracks on this album are undeniably some of the best ever played in a genre that prides itself on guitarwork and, in my opinion, the highlight of the album as a whole.

Nicko McBrain, as always, is a pillar of drumming strength. He once again justifies his name as one of the best rock drummers alive (or dead, as a matter of fact), right next to the likes of Ian Paice and Nick Mason. For the first time a producer has taken proper notice of his demonic single bass pedal and worked to showcase it, making this the best McBrain Experience since Piece of Mind, and probably even better.

Track by track

The Wicker Man starts with an intro that immediately throws you back to Killers and songs like Charlotte the Harlot. This impression soon fades as a much more modern sound takes over and the guitars start showing who's boss on this album with a quality and coherency comparable to the Phantom of the Opera performance on Live After Death. Smith delivers a solo unlike any I've heard before in a Maiden song. This song bears all the marks of another Maiden anthem and live staple. Its chorus is eminently sing-along-able--you can practically hear a throng of 20,000 headbangers in a stadium shouting "your time will come."

Nothing you can contemplate will ever be the same
Every second is a new spark, sets the universe aflame

While the theme of Ghost of the Navigator is very much reminiscent of the Rime of the Ancient Mariner and its lyrics, I find it closer to Powerslave. Some prog elements sneak in but the riffs and changes are true Maiden and the intro is a very nicely done acoustic bit. Dickinson's vocals stand out on this track and display a versatility we're not accustomed to.

Where I go I do not know, I only know the place I've been
Dreams they come and go, ever shall be so
Nothing's real until you feel

Who'da thunk it that dying swans and mother love would make it into an Iron Maiden album. The lyrics to Brave New World are so totally gothic it's hard to believe. This is more comparable to their recent albums though Bayley could not have delivered it like Dickinson who steals the show here too before Gers' almost plaintive guitar and Murray's epic style steal it back.

"Dying swans, twisted wings, you know, the agony, the death. Brave New World doesn't want to see that. It has no use for either the life or the death. All it has use for is the image..." --B.D.

Blood Brothers is the obligatory "long story" that has to be on every album. I think its style is much like that of Infinite Dreams, one of my favourites. This song belongs to Harris and his crunching basslines add to what's a clearly classical-influenced composition. It's one of those works that reminds you how closely heavy metal is related to classical music. Sad but uplifting music in 3/4 time.

The Mercenary is simply good old blood and guts metal like The Trooper or Sun and Steel. Indeed it would not have been out of place on Piece of Mind. For some reason I keep expecting to hear Rory Gallagher's voice when it begins...

Dream of Mirrors is thematologically closer to Infinite Dreams and resembles it quite a bit. The chorus in this song is one of the best they've ever written and highly catchy. It slowly develops from atmospheric piece into the full-blown epic speed metal that lesser bands have been trying to copy for the last twenty years and fades out again like it started. Particularly impressive is McBrain's footwork in the last third of the track where he matches Harris note for note after accompanying the rest of the song with a light, subtle touch.

I only dream in black and white, I only dream cause I'm alive.
I only dream in black and white, to save me from myself

The Fallen Angel is another old-style, speedy Maiden track in which you recognize the band that created The Number of the Beast. Eschatology, the unclean and the fate of the divine are some of their favourite themes and this Powerslave-like piece shows it best. Genuine Maiden all the way with the rhythm section leading the way and the guitars and vocals fighting back.

The Nomad starts out by painting a desert picture with an Arabic rhythm, led by McBrain and followed by Murray with a recurring theme. I find it most comparable to To Tame a Land (apparently I'm not the only one who thinks so) with touches of Rime of the Ancient Mariner if you need another reference, though its unusual motives do set it apart. I don't think it's all about Bedouins... more likely Harris had a historical figure in mind but who that was gets lost. I think this is the only song in which Dickinson isn't quite up to the job but then I can't think of anyone who would be. I'd like to hear Ronnie James Dio try it though. All said, it's a superb piece of symphonic metal.

Out of the Silent Planet is described by Dickinson as being in the vein of Run to the Hills. It paints the same bleak picture that 2 Minutes to Midnight does. Once again the end of the world is nigh with this eschatological gem of alien invasion, death and destruction.

Withered hands, withered bodies begging for salvation
Deserted by the hand of gods of their own creation
Nations cry underneath decaying skies above
You are guilty, the punishment is death for all who live

The Thin Line Between Love And Hate is, again, about life and death, karma and retribution, another one of Harris's pet subjects. Think The Evil That Men Do theme-wise, though the music is more akin to T-Rex or Judas Priest's flavour of hard rock (or UFO, as Dickinson rightly claims). The props for this song must be evenly divided between Murray's softly distorted guitar and McBrain's masterful, trance-like inverted beat. Never mind the voices at the end of the track, they're only in your head.

I will hope, my soul will fly, so I will live forever
Heart will die, my soul will fly, and I will live forever

Should I buy it?

Beyond doubt, the answer is yes. It only charted at #7 (UK) but that, as we all know, is no criterion by which to judge a work these days. I was long of the opinion that Maiden had four "classic" albums, now I say they have five. I didn't think I'd be saying this again, but well... 'kin hell! Up the Irons.



On an other note, unrelated to the album and after reading significance x's writeup below, and seeing that much thought and effort is devoted to comparisons and declarations of one's superiority over the other, I have one thing to point out as regards the comparison between George Orwell's 1984 and Aldous Huxley's work, and disregarding the fact that both are severely flawed as regards literary technique but nonetheless acknowledging that they were both revolutionary in the concepts they present:

1984 is "more scary" because it's dystopian and paints pictures of oppression, even though some of its key elements are contrived to the extent of exaggeration. The Brave New World of Huxley is more palatable. The net effect may be the same--an ordered society with an official dislike of individuality and a stricter set of behavioural standards than we're used to--but Big Brother (key: impersonal instrument of the System) is perceived as being much more unpleasant by the standards we've been brought up with than the benevolent Mustapha Mond (key: willing servant of the System). All other scenaria excluded and assuming one considers both to be equally undesirable, your choice is between being stabbed and being stabbed in the back with a smile. Which one is scarier depends on one's very personal perception.

While the reality of 1984 may have been a more tangible possibility before the end of the cold war and in the light of numerous regimes that employed (or would like to have employed) its methodology, Brave New World approaches contemporary reality more closely in a "western" republic where ideas and perceptions are imposed by means of manipulation and technology (being fundamental to both) is presented as purely benign when it can just as easily be used for the same purposes as Orwell's.

What you might want to think of as "scary" is that reality in an information-driven technological society is closer to a combination of the fundamental ideas behind the two works. The ideas that Huxley presents can be used to promote Orwellian scenaria and vice versa. The dichotomy between Brave New World and 1984 is false.

(thing) by Demeter Thu Jan 10 2002 at 9:51:21

In Brave New World, Aldous Huxley presents us with a future in which humans are engineered to fulfill a given role in society, conditioned to be satisfied and happy in this role, and provided with euphorics to ensure their happiness is reinforced. The society is run by World Controllers and has the motto "Community, Identity, Stability"

Children are created in vitro, and endowed with characteristics to fit them to a caste: Alpha, Beta, Gamma, Delta or Epsilon. The Alphas are the leaders and thinkers, the Epsilons the work-drones. At the top, Alphas and Betas are raised from single eggs and are unique individuals, at the bottom the eggs are divided to create multiples -- the lower the caste, the greater numbers of infants produced from each egg.

They are raised in nurseries where they are taught to celebrate their position in the society, listing its advantages, and the disadvantages of the other strata, in a mantra. There is no movement between social groups and no unrest. A daily ration of the drug soma provides a feeling of ecstasy to emphasise the desirability of people's lives.

It is clear that the planners and implementers of this future have worked with the best of intentions to create a Utopia -- but it is presented in such a way that we, the readers, are clearly expected to view it instead as a dystopia. The characters are, superficially, happy, satisfied and serene, but we are encouraged to see the shallowness, artificiality and sensationalism of their lives.

Sex is encouraged, open and without jealousy, but it is also without any depth of emotion. Love-making is no more than a transaction between a couple or group for mutual pleasure, and monogamy is positively frowned on. Individuals recommend sexual partners to each other on the basis of their performance -- how "pneumatic" they are.

Families no longer exist, and hence there are no family enmities or feuds, but the society is also without any real care or nurturing -- people don't grow, they are simply moulded.

Religion based on the idea of a higher power has been replaced by a worship of consumerism and consumption, with society itself being the higher power. This power is represented in the person of Mustapha Mond, an iconic, and initially mysterious figure.

The story primarily takes place in London, and the first lead character we meet is Bernard Marx, an undersized Alpha who is believed to have accidentally received a dose of alcohol as a foetus -- something that is done to lower caste foetuses to limit their growth. He is "different", alienated and not well liked. He also has a crush on Lenina Crowne, and has invited her to go with him to visit the Savage Reservations (an area where current societal conditions are still maintained, although with fewer facilities than in the current developed world). Lenina has been seeing another man, Henry Foster, for several months, but since monogamous relationships are strongly discouraged, she has agreed to go along with Bernard, who she quite likes.

Bernard needs permission to enter the Reservations. As he is getting this from his Director, Tomakin, the Director reminisces about a trip he made to the reservation 25 years earlier with a woman. She got lost in a storm and had to be left behind. Perhaps realizing that this story reveals too much about him, Tomakin becomes defensive, and yells at Bernard, chasing him away.

Bernard goes from here to visit his closest friend Helmholz Watson, an intellectually superior Alpha who is as disaffected as Bernard with society -- he is unchallenged by his job as a writer of inspiring slogans, and yearns to turn his talent to something worthwhile, but can't find what. These two men are opposite sides of the same coin, one excluded by perceived inferiority, and one by actual superiority from full participation in their society, and joined together by their exclusion.

In a call to Helmholz, as he leaves for the reservation, Bernard learns that Tomakin plans to transfer him to Iceland, for antisocial behaviour.

Then he gets lucky -- or so it seems. In the reservation, he meets John Savage, the son of the woman Tomakin left behind and Tomakin himself. This is bound to cause a huge scandal in a society that considers live birth disgusting and corrupt. John is good-looking, intelligent and consumed with curiosity about the Utopia he has heard so much about from his mother, and, potentially, he is Bernard's escape from Iceland.

Bernard brings both John and his mother Linda back to London with him. When Tomakin berates Bernard in public, and tells him that he is to be transferred, Bernard presents the pair to the Director, who is therefore forced to resign as a result of the humiliation. Bernard remains in London.

John, initially, is overcome with wonder at the cleanliness and apparent happiness of the city, and exclaims, in Miranda's words from The Tempest: "Oh Brave New World, that has such people in it!", the source of the book's title. He is captivated, but soon things begin to go sour as cultures begin, inevitably, to clash.

Connection with John makes Bernard a celebrity, and for the first time he is fully accepted into society. The popularity goes to his head, and he becomes arrogant, and treats John as a showpiece. He throws a party for several prominent people to meet John, but unhappy with the way Bernard has treated him, John refuses to attend.

Bernard is embarrassed, and slides again into his position as outsider, which causes him to grow closer to John again. Helmholz too, becomes close to the man from outside and when John introduces him to Shakespeare, he realises that this is the kind of thing he has been yearning to write.

While this is going on, Lenina has developed an interest in John, and he has fallen in love with her. When she goes to visit him, he tells her of his feelings, and she reacts as her socialisation demands -- by stripping naked and preparing for sex. The romantic John, whose morals are those of Shakespeare and the savages, is shocked. He calls her a "strumpet", and hits her.

A telephone interrupts him before he can do Lenina any real damage, and calls him to the hospital, where Linda is dying from overuse of the drug, soma, that she has missed so much on the reservation. As John sits at her bedside, a large group of children arrive for conditioning, and notice Linda, commenting on how ugly she appears to them. Furious and hurt, he chases them off. Linda is delirious and spaced out, and fails to recognise her son, and as he shakes her to try to bring her back to herself, she chokes and dies.

John blames himself for Linda's death, and is now thoroughly disturbed and traumatised. While leaving the hospital, he comes upon a Delta group waiting in line for their daily soma ration. Seized with the urge to change what he now sees as a corrupt society to something better, John first tries to dissuade them from taking the drug that is poisoning their minds, and when he fails to sway them he starts to throw the drug away. A riot follows and Bernard and Helmholz come along and are caught up in it.

The three men are arrested, and taken to the religious leader Mustapha Mond, where Bernard and Helmholz are judged too individualistic to remain as part of society, and exiled to an island for social outcasts.

John now passionately wants to return to his home, being completely disgusted and disillusioned with the regulated Utopia which suppresses individuality and emotion through artificially engendered contentment. He tells Mond that he wants to go somewhere that he can experience the full range of human emotion, but Mond is determined to keep him close by, so that the experiment of transplanting a member of the savage community in the Utopia can continue.

John runs away, and sets himself up in an abandoned lighthouse on the outskirts of London. He plants a garden, and builds bows and arrows to protect himself. Overcome with guilt for Linda's death, he makes a whip and starts to flagellate himself. A group of passing Deltas see this and soon reporters arrive to film and interview him. While he manages to scare most of them away, one manages to record him, and crowds start to gather to watch him punish himself.

Amongst the crowd is Lenina, and when John sees her, he attacks her with the whip. To calm him, the crowd chants `orgy-porgy' a sensual hymn used to generate a feeling of oneness. He gets caught up in this, and awakes the next day having been seduced into taking soma and indulging in the sexual rites that go along with the hymn.

He is overwhelmed with guilt and self-hatred at this betrayal of his principals and commits suicide, by hanging himself from an archway.

The Utopia continues, unchanged, but John, Bernard, Helmholz, Linda and Tomakin have all been destroyed by it, one way or another -- it crushes anything that doesn't conform. The message is clear: this is totalitarianism, however benign it might seem on the surface, and universal happiness can only be bought through slavery -- freedom requires unhappiness, as well as joy.

As an aside, in Demolition Man, Sandra Bullock's character is named Lenina Huxley, and Sylvester Stallone's is John Spartan-- a clear reference to Brave New World and its author, in a movie where the society portrayed has more than a nodding aquaintance with the dystopia of the book.

(thing) by Absolute Zero Fri Jan 25 2002 at 1:40:24
Brave New World is not, or not just, a dystopian horror story. It asks a fundamental question about our society, one without easy answers: "What is our goal, and will we like it if we get it?"

Frequently we identify the goal of society by the Utilitarian "greatest happiness for the greatest number" principle. And in practice, the kind of happiness this usually results in is calm, content, and comfortable. Our ideal society would cause the minimum amount of discomfort to the maximum number of people.

As Mustapha Mond points out, the World State is based on exactly this comfort principle. Everything that causes pain has been removed. Nearly everyone is calm, content, and comfortable nearly all the time. Anything that had to be sacrificed to achieve this goal was sacrificed.

It is these sacrifices which cause the horror we feel on contemplating the World State. The State, as Mond recounts, is a result of the World Controllers realizing that if they were to achieve comfort and stability, all other ideals must be sacrificed.

Art is done away with, because the passion needed to create it is linked to suffering and discontent. Science and the pursuit of Truth must cease, because they constantly upset our view of the world. Religion is gone, because the New Man may have no god but pleasure. Love is dead, and with it family, because the bonds of affection for any particular person lead to passion, which leads to instability.

This is what we would need to give up, if we were ever to achieve the ideal for which we have always been striving. This is the world we would make, if the dream of contentment were realized. Huxley shows it to be a nightmarish, intolerable place. The contentment finally achieved is a faint pretense at true happiness. With contentment as our goal, we will be forced to give up all of the other things in life for it, and the contentment we seek will be poisoned. In short, Huxley is telling us that we need a better goal.

(idea) by significance x Thu Mar 21 2002 at 19:00:46

Brave New World is a phrase taken from Shakespeare's Tempest:

Brave New World O, wonder! How many goodly creatures are there here! How beauteous mankind is! O brave new world, That has such people in't!

It depicts a dystopia (the was word coined in 1950s, two decades after the book was pulished -- meaning a place directly opposite of Utopia). Huxley paints a bleak, dark place, situated in remote future, where humanity has chosen the wrong course.

Brave New World surprised me by both by its brilliance and -- in some areas -- its shortcomings. For example, in this book, published in 1932, reproduction is carried out through in vitro fertilization. This process also employs another technique, called a rather tongue-twisting bokanovskification, whereby one zygote is treated to churn out up to 96 clones (How eerily prescient, taking into account that the first mammalian clone, the famous sheep Dolly, was created not before 1997. Current record of producing most clones from a single cell is still a paltry 9 mice). Some scenes in the book even remind one of the rows upon rows of test-tube humans in the recent movie The Matrix. This process of reproduction was so fantastic that one of the greatest science fiction writers of the twentieth century, Isac Asimov, could not visualize it even in 1957 (!) while writing his classic "The Naked Sun". In this sci-fi thriller, he describes a colonized planet Solaria, where humans had become so reclusive that the presence of any other person in their close vicinity was absolutely abhorrent -- they meet each other through a 3D holographic device. But however nauseating the presence of any other human being near them, even those hermits produce babies in the good old fashion of us earthlings! This makes it absolutely sure that Asimov didn't read Brave New World.

But on the other hand, the characterization of Huxley leaves much to be desired. All characters are one-dimensional and stiff. Lenina (the heroine), Bernard, Linda, the director and others are as life-like as street-shop mannequins. And I found the character of the Savage - champion of the cause of freewill and old-fashioned humanity -- the most unbelievable. I fail to comprehend how a person who lived all his life in an almost pre-historic environment and who never read any book in his life except the works of Shakespeare (how did he manage to understand him is another matter!) can be so erudite and so thoughtful as to engage in philosophical discussions on history, psychology and human behaviour? I think this is a big flaw that holds back an otherwise brilliant book.

It would be worthwhile here take into account another great 20th century dystopia 1984 by George Orwell. Although it's hard to compare these two novels but in my opinion 1984 is much more terrifying and Orwell's future world is much grimmer than Huxley's. And his characters, too, are more believable.

(idea) by gm Thu Mar 21 2002 at 20:03:29

I have to disagree with significance x's appraisal that 1984 is more terrifying than Brave New World. While Orwell's universe may be "darker" simply by virtue of describing more torture scenes, there are several other failings in the book. He provides no reasonable way for EngSoc to have come to power -- they offer nothing to the people. In addition, Orwell's people are incredibly gullible -- not even the USSR attempted to convince its "citizens" that its enemies never changed. Similarly, while the Ministry of Truth's constant revisions of previous estimates parallels similar practices in various totalitarian regimes, the subjects of those regimes rarely if ever believed the revisions. Almost any book written by someone inside the Soviet Union will convey the wide extent to which the population saw through the CPSU's lies. In contrast, Huxley's vision does not require deception or mass coercion on the part of the government. Instead, it relies on satisfying the wants of most of the population, and relying on their not noticing that there's more out there. A critical scene in this regard is the one in which the Savage attempts to preach to a group of deltas about the evils of Soma, and they don't understand him -- not because his vocabulary or concepts are particularly above theirs, but because the concept of living less happily doesn't make sense to them.

The characterization of John is one of the weaker points of Brave New World, but I think the rest of the novel compensates for it. It's certainly not as bad as the political treatise Orwell introduces in the middle of 1984, while contending that it's part of a novel.

(thing) by comp.sci Thu May 09 2002 at 11:11:53
BRAVE NEW WORLD (the film)

The book/film is set in an imaginary world, where free love, independent thinking and emotions are unwanted. People are conditioned to be happy and whenever they feel any real emotions, they take some antidepressant, called Soma. Society is split up into four classes of people, chosen by their mental capabilities, ranging from alpha to delta. Alpha are supposed to be the most intelligent and are trained to lead and support others, but they all don't really realize that everything is lead by the Controller. He was the one who founded this new world and created it's ideologies and rules and his main goal is to ensure false happiness for everyone. Of course he thinks that he does the right thing, but as the story evolves, we will see that he is wrong. The other classes are betas, gammas and deltas where deltas are on the lowest level and have to do the physical work.

From birth on, all people are constantly conditioned in enormous conditioning centers to be happy and to love their work. The most important slogan that turn up is "Everyone is equally important".

Sounds like a good idea to make everyone feel important, but it has it's downsides. In this brave new world, love is unwanted and not needed anymore so it is just reduced to physical contact.

But there are places called "Reservations" where live is practically as it is now. Definitely not perfect, but far more desireable than the brave new world. The people in the bnw are totally seperated from the "real world" and when one day John, who is living in a Reservation, comes to the city, it draws a lot of media attention on him. He simply can not understand how those people can stand to live in this new world, without love and feelings. He finds some friends who he influences a lot, and one of them is Lenina (I hope I got the name right). There is a small group of people that are advising and helping the controller and one of them is Lenina's friend.

As the story goes on, John practically becomes the reality show of the bnw and when the media attention and the whole situation becomes unbearable for him, he commits suicide. He had really tried to change this new world, to lead them back on the right way, but he couldn't succeed. What probably nobody will never find out, is the fact that one of the people out of the group that is surrounding the controller, was John's father and in the bnw, the words "father" and "mother" are bad language, because all children are rather produced then born.

Heavily impressed by John's death, Lenina and her friend start thinking about their current live and when she finds out that she is pregnant, she decides not to abort the baby (what is totally common in this world) but to keep it and to leave the city and to live in the country with her friend.

Themes:

There is a wide range of themes in this book/film, lead, once again, by love. For me love was the most important theme because it's missing made all the people unhappy. Other themes are for instance independent thinking, discrimination, a person's identity and place in the society as well as emotions and feelings. Another major theme is the theme of power, personalized by the controller.

Personal comment:

I like the story and the themes of the film a lot, but I think I would have enjoyed more to read the book than to watch the film. Anyways, the film was overally pretty good and I enjoyed watching it.

As I already mentioned, I particularely liked the story, but I fear that our world is slowly shifting in that direction too. Some items of the plot are near reality already, like the human cloning that is done by Severino Antinory, the italian doctor that is claming that he already has done experiments on cloning humans. Out of the story I conclude that it should be one of our main goals to ensure a life with free will and emotions for everyone. John stated this opinion like this:

"I don't want comfort, I want God, I want poetry, I want danger, I want freedom"

(thing) by syntax Sun May 25 2003 at 17:52:53
Just some notes I wrote for my English class:


Characters

The first character introduced in the novel is the Director of Hatcheries and Conditioning (DHC) of Central London (later referred to by his real name -Tomakin). The director is first introduced on pages 19-20, his physical appearance is vividly described as "Tall and rather thin but upright, ... He had a long chin and big, rather prominent teeth, just covered, when he was not talking, by his full, floridly curved lips. Old, young? Thirty? Fifty? ... It was hard to say." (Huxley 20). The director's unknown age is quite significant for him as an introductory character as the reader later finds that the scientists in Brave New World managed to slow down aging, making people young until the day they die. The director introduces a group of students as well as the reader to some of the most important concepts on which the fictional society is built.

Henry Foster is a minor character who is introduced as a technician at the Central London hatchery and Conditioning Centre. He is Described as "a ruddy young man" (Huxley 24)Mr. Foster is an expert on many procedures that take place in the centre and explains some of them to the students (and, once again, to the reader). His only major significance is to introduce the reader to the setting and his short role as one of Lenina's lovers.

Mustapha Mond is introduced in Chapter 3; he is the Resident Controller for Western Europe, one of the ten controllers in the world. As a controller, Mond receives a great amount of respect from the general public, and is referred to as "His Fordship" (for more information see Setting and Symbolism). At the beginning of the novel Mond acts in a the same manner as all the other conditioned characters - he strongly opposes to the ideas of the old world and concepts such as motherhood, creative literature and culture in the old sense of the word. Later on through the novel Mond shows his true personality and belief system as he boldly states that "I make the laws here, I can also break them." (Huxley 217). Through his conversation with the savage, Mond agrees with many of John's views on Shakespeare and other issues. Mond states that he loves poetic literature and science, but cannot let others practice them because they are dangerous concepts that threaten happiness.

Bernard Marx, one of the major characters in the novel, is introduced on the same chapter as Mustapha Mond and is an Alpha-Plus psychologist and specialist in hypnopaedia. Bernard, unlike other conditioned individuals, does not like modern society and the way relationships are supposed to work. Fanny says "They say he doesn't like Obstacle Golf ... And then he spends most of his time alone." (Huxley 57)These words may not seem like serious accusations but for the society described in the novel all people are supposed to enjoy the same activities - obstacle golf is used here as an example of such an activity - and dislike solitude. That, taken along with his unusual height, makes Bernard an extremely abnormal character and is the reason he is not very popular in society. Bernard's views include opposition to conditioning and the lack of serious relationships in society.

Lenina Crowne (the name's similarity to Vladimir Lenin is with no doubt intentional) is the major female character in the novel and the only major character who fully agrees with the current system and is correctly conditioned. Lenina is first introduced as a lab worker in the London Hatchery and Conditioning Centre. She is described as the ideal chara