Is Biological Stability Logically Equivalent to Thermodynamic Stability?
(If you cannot see the fundamental importance of this you are a cretin.) In his famous book 'What is life?' Erwin Shroedinger asked the question 'Why do not organisms eat diamond mush?' The Alchemist's argument is based on the idea that catalysts cannot overcome large energy barriers - why is that then - it is, at least for me, news? (Recall that evolution is God-like in its ingenuity.)
If a diamond were thrown into a cess pit it would not be attacked by the microbes, even though it has the energy content roughly of sugar - the diamond has biological stability (persists a long time).
If it were to hang in space it would take a very long time to evaporate - it is thermodynamically stable.
What Shrodinger was asking was, I believe, 'Does thermodynamic stability imply biological stability? and 'Does biological stability imply thermodynamic stability?' Should the answer be 'yes' this would be a profoundly important fundamental of both physics and biology.
|