Everything2
Near Matches
Ignore Exact
Full Text
Everything2

freedom of expression

created by CentrX

(idea) by 18thCandidate (10.8 mon) (print)   ?   (I like it!) 1 C! Thu Sep 20 2001 at 4:25:24

Freedom of expression refers directly to the combination of freedom of speech, freedom of assembly, and freedom of press without government interference. These freedoms are guaranteed to all Americans by the first amendment to the Constitution of the United States.

Essentially, freedom of expression boils down to the right to have our say on any issue, as well as the right to hear what others have to say. For the most part, due to these provisions in the Bill of Rights, all Americans have the right to criticize public officials and their actions without fear of imprisonment or reprisal by any branch of the government.

These freedoms stretch to many forms of expression beyond mere words or writing. Gestures, movements, articles of clothing, and other forms of expressive conduct are considered symbolic speech and are granted substantial protection by the court system. A strong example of this protection is in the Supreme Court case Texas v. Johnson, where burning the American flag was considered to legally be a form of symbolic expression and thus protected by the First Amendment. Even further, in 1992, the Court in R.A.V. v. City of St. Paul, Minnesota, the court stated that the burning of religious symbols or other bias-related disorderly conduct is constitutionally protected provided the actions didn't violate other safety laws.

Prior restraint is also an issue in terms of freedom of expression; can the government restrict something from being stated before it has the opportunity to be stated? In other words, if you have some prior knowledge, can the government prevent you from saying it? The answer, legally, is that with freedom of expression, the government cannot restrict individuals from speaking their mind prior to their action. This was defended in the Pentagon Papers case, New York Times v. United States, in which the Washington Post and the New York Times were about to print some documents obtained illegally pertaining to military action in Vietnam. The Supreme Court said that they could in fact print these papers and that the government could not restrain them.

Another issue in terms of freedom of expression is obscenity. Generally, the court system tries to stay away from this issue by leaving it up to communities themselves to determine what is obscene, but it will largely defend the freedom of expression in any legal situation it has to deal with. A notable exception to this is the possession of child pornography, which is generally outlawed because of its exploitation of children.

Although freedom of expression is very broad and largely protected by the court system in the United States, there are still many elements of expression that are forbidden for various reasons.

Libel and slander, or the statement or publication of false and defamating statements about an individual or group are outlawed. This is illegal because libel and slander can be used to violate the rights of others without merit.

Fighting words are also outlawed, meaning that one cannot use their freedom of speech or press in order to instigate a crowd to acts of violence. This means that it is illegal to utter racial slurs and other such statements in order to instigate violence. Also illegal is heckling, at least to the point where it interferes with the speaker and his or her ability to speak.

Freedom of press and speech are also not allowed in situations of clear and present danger, which means that any speech that causes an immediate or imminent danger to the nation that Congress otherwise could prevent. This includes speaking in such a fashion as to instigate a military conflict with another nation or to incite widespread rioting.

The bad-tendency rule is somewhat more controversial, in that it curtails First Amendment freedoms in the situation that it may directly lead to significant crimes. This rule applies when, for example, an individual repeatedly speaks on behalf of a plot to violently overthrow governments with extreme bloodshed, as was the case in Gitlow v. New York.

In the United States, freedom of expression is a fundamental and well-protected right of all citizens.


printable version
chaos

bowdlerize Information War is coming: whose side are you on? chattering class Freedom of speech
The threat of freedom Dream Log: December 24, 2000 Ich bin ein Auslander propriety
modernista R v. Butler Is it unpatriotic to protest? Group processes observed in the Hevert Ying Fortune Cookie Factory
A letter to the Editor: Aggressive policing Human Rights Act 1998: Schedule 1 Human Rights Act 1998: Other Rights and Proceedings Queen Beatrix
Human Rights Act 1998 hippie free speech EFF
Freedom of speech is not freedom from repercussions of speech If someone wants to do something and it isn't hurting you... DON'T BE A FUCKING DICK Singing The Star-Spangled Banner Fighting Words
Y'know, if you log in, you can write something here, or contact authors directly on the site. Create a New User if you don't already have an account.
  Epicenter
Login
Password

password reminder
register

Everything2 Help

Cool Staff Picks
The best nodes of all time:
Supergirl
How to buy drugs in an open-air market
Secrets to Living in "The Big Room"
Everywhere Is Kitten Trouble
Reading between the lines of an Annual Report
The evolutionary purpose of human body hair
sustainable development
INXS
Searching for signs of life in the bottom of a cup of cold coffee
Black & White
Gustav Mahler
Fluke
The die is cast, you will cut the mustard or face the music
New Writeups
antigravpussy
One fly amongst many(person)
sam512
Moon Base Shackleton, 1978(fiction)
Pavlovna
toy boy(person)
XWiz
tear jerker(review)
Heitah
Anarchy is Order(idea)
jessicaj
July 26, 2008(dream)
Berek
ABBA(person)
devolution
k-hole(place)
Nadine_2
The Sound Of Madness(review)
SwimmingMonkey
Conversations with Fo Fo, the Loneliest dog in Purgatory(fiction)
locke baron
lynx(thing)
Simulacron3
Reality, Dimensions and the Natural Ontology(essay)
SubSane
Making Love to a 9-Foot Woman(person)
Ouzo
Thoughts(idea)
antigravpussy
I fall silent, listening. The breadcrumbs are talking about us(person)
This page courtesy of The Everything Development Company