though i'm
agnostic and not particularly in favor of
genocide,
nastiness,
xenophobia, or the
supression of independent thought, i don't think you can say that
the bible itself sucks. granted, it's an
intolerant collection of stories written by generally intolerant
old men. one can only hope they did it because they didn't know any better and that it was not a contrived attempt to
slander any group not white, male, hetro, and christian.
but it's kind of the same as saying that
beavis and butthead are responsible for
juvenile delinquency. yes, it's not enlightening, probably just the opposite. but the people who read it hold ultimate
responsibility for what they do in its name.
the argument can be made that
knowledge cannot be good or bad. it's how people apply it that can be
judged, morally. the bible is just a long, goofy
fairy tale and while it may suck, it doesn't provide an impetus to
hatred or
violence that humanity couldn't just as easily have found elsewhere.