IQ is not related to
race. It is related to
social level.
This confusion is nothing new.
European aristocracy is the best example of a
social class who thought their
culture and their
intellectual advance were an absolute proof of their
genetic superiority. The rise of the
bourgeoisie, and the
Revolutions which followed (most notably in
America and
France) proved them wrong.
There are (at least) 2 very simple (and purely
technical) ways to prove that
IQ is more correlated to "
well-offness" than to
DNA or
race :
- Studying the average IQ of Black children adopted by White people, or more generally of children from poor families adopted by wealthy families. It will almost certainly be higher (on average) than the IQ of their biological relatives.
- The Ainu people live in Japan, on the Hokkaido island. They have two distinctive characteristics :
This book is scientifically
rubbish. As Mr Gould put it, "(it) is simply a more polite way to call the Blacks
dirty niggers". It is difficult to understand how such a blatantly flawed reasoning generated so much
debate.